Research Article | Open Access

A systematic review of racial biases in healthcare workers and healthcare disparities

Victor G. Aeby*, Tracy Carpenter-Aeby, Shyla Cabell, Roger Crowe, Brianna Knox and Tram Nguyen

Author Affiliations

*Corresponding author: Victor G. Aeby
Associate Professor, Department of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, 408 S. Eastern Street, Greenville, NC 27858, USA;aebyv@ecu.edu

Received: August 29th, 2017; Accepted: September 21st, 2017; Published: September 25th, 2017

Life Sci Press. 2017; 1(1): 7-18. doi: 10.28964/LifesciPress-1-102

Ⓒ 2017 Copyright by Aeby VG, et al. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

ABSTRACT

United States health care may exhibit note worthy racial disparities as a result of racial bias among health providers. Racial bias is an issue in the United States that can have a substantial impact on the lives of individuals of racial minority. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the number of articles that occur in the social work literature regarding disparities in healthcare related to racial bias. A Cochrane Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was used to identify existing professional social work literature on the existence of racial bias in health disparities pertaining to the social work field. Results indicated that manyhealthcare providers exhibit racial bias in their practice. This bias was found to be implicit rather than explicit bias. While explicit bias was present in professionals who express racist ideologies, they imply a minimal portion of the population when compared to professionals who unknowingly present implicit bias. Future interventions will need to focus on training healthcare professionals and future healthcare professionals the importance of addressing racial bias, especially in the form of implicit bias. Alerting medical school and social work educators to the findings may be the first step necessary to begin removing racial bias from healthcare.

KEYWORDS: Healthcare; Disparities; Racial bias; Social work.

ABBREVIATIONS:SLR: Systematic Literature Review; AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; NHDR: National Healthcare Disparities Report; NHQR: National Healthcare Quality Report.

INTRODUCTION

Professional literature on prevalent culture and healthcare distribution in the United States appears to attribute racial bias among healthcare providers as one possible contribution to racial disparities. Individuals of ethnic minority may experience racial bias in healthcare settings, which may have negativelyimpacted minorities. Some researchers believe that racial bias mayguide healthcare professionals to make medical decisions solely based on the patient’s race.1 For this reason, it is important to understand the professional literature to identify appropriate, purposeful interventions. The results of this study may direct medical professions and healthcare workers to possible interventions that may reduce negative perceptions towards minorities and thereby improve medical care. This awareness may mitigate health disparities in the U.S., at least by healthcare workers, and perhapscreate a more just system of healthcare for all who are served.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Racial Bias

According to Blair, Havranek et al bias can be defined as “the negative evaluation of one group and its members relative to another.”2 Bias itself can be divided into two different categories: explicit and implicit bias.2-4 Explicit bias entails that the person is aware of the assessment, believes that assessment is true and has the time and motivation to act on it in the current situation.2 In simple terms, this means that the person will have a preconceived belief about another person’s race and act in accordance to that belief by expressing racial bias towards them. Conversely, implicit bias operates in an unintentional and unconscious manner. The individual develops an unconscious racial bias and reacts based on inward held anxieties towards racial minorities without even realizing they acted in that fashion. The implicit biases that contribute to many of the disparities in healthcare are stereotypes that have been passed on by the physician’s culture and ingrained into their memory. Stereotypes are defined as a mental cognition that contains a person’s knowledge, beliefs, and expectations for a group of people.5 While physicians could act overtly in stereotyping, the majority are influenced without their own knowledge. Multiple studies have shown explicit bias to be virtually non-existent in healthcare today, and therefore will not be an extensive issue in this review of the literature.2,6

Several studies state that implicit racial bias is a leading cause of healthcare disparities.7-9 Health disparities refer to differences in healthcare by race or ethnicity. Another term associated with “health disparities” is “health inequities,” which is said to refer to differences in healthcare related to social class.10 While “inequities” would cover a portion of the ethnic minority population, it does not cover all. Therefore, the term “disparities” is a proper fit for this study. Healthcare disparities can be classified as either acceptable or unacceptable, but it depends of the source of the disparity. For example, if disparity occurs because of a difference in patient preference in how the doctor works with them, it is acceptable. It becomes unacceptable when people with equal access to healthcare are treated differently as a result of race or ethnicity. Some examples of health disparities impacting racial bias mentioned by Dovidio et al include that African-American women with osteoporosis were less likely to receive testing and appropriate medication and that African-American prostate cancer patients were more likely to have delayed active treatments and were found to wait longer for medical monitoring.8 Several other studies indicate that the level of implicit bias held by the physicians affected whether they would prescribe the necessary drug treatments to their ethnic minority patients.8,11 It has also been found that because of implicit bias physicians often view African-American patients as uncooperative and less compliant.3,8 This is likely a result of unconscious perceptions made based on learned stereotypes that African-Americans are less intelligent than Caucasian patients. This appears to occur no matter the patients age, gender, degree of income, or level of education.6,7 While these actions may seem like conscious choices made by the physicians, they are actions of unconscious bias.

Healthcare Provider Bias

Healthcare provider biases are a major factor that determines racial disparities in providing care and the resulting outcomes.12 However, implicit racial bias not only impacts a physician’s behavior toward an ethnic minority patient, but also on how the ethnic minority patient feels about the interaction with the provider.5 Another term associated with implicit bias is “Personally-mediated bias”, also referred to as racial bias. It is a subcategory of institutionalized bias in which has two factors to take in consideration: (1) the subconscious mind and (2) the potency of the impact the unconscious thoughts towards prejudice and discrimination. This constitutes that those factors interpret a negative conception, which conceives disrespect and deliverance of poor service to those that are at disadvantaged.13,14 Therefore, whether we use the terminology of implicit bias or person-mediated bias, healthcare providers are likely to make rushed medical judgments and decisions based on an individual’s ethnicity due the pressures of being a provider which entails limit on time, quick decision making, and limited resources.13

Minority Group Contributions

According to the analysis completed by the Kaiser Family Foundation collected from the 2016 U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey, there are approximately 39% of ethnic minorities residing in America.15 Cambridge English Dictionary defines “Ethnic Minority” as “a group of people of a particular race or nationality living in a country or area where most people are from a different race ornationality.”16 To be connected in an ethnic minority group means those individuals share cultural experiences that consist of language, cuisine, artistic expression, traditions, and a community that is unique to their people. Together, many different ethnic groups of color amalgamate the United States to create a nation of diversity and culture. Throughout history, ethnic minorities have influenced the construction of monuments, the evolution of federal policy, creation of pop culture, and the development of the healthcare system. There may be a number of positive factors ethnic groups bring to the U.S., and yet may be diluted by marginalization created by racial biases and discrimination. This paper explores the possibility of the role healthcare worker bias as one of the factors creating disparities.

Racial Disparities in society

Racism has been defined as a belief that there are inherent differences among those of different racial groups, which help determine one’s cultural or personal achievement.17 The concept of racism is a common phenomenon that has been around for decades and fought against. Political influences, for example, Martin Luther King and other ethnic community members have risked their lives for equal social justice. In recent years, greater awareness of civil rights has now become an implicit act. In the United States, 84% of the African-American population reports that racism is still an existing problem.12 This suggests one of the many concerns of minority groups, access to quality healthcare services.

Distribution of equal treatment has been a growing area of concern as racial minorities experience a decreased quality of care as a result of receiving mediocre healthcare services.18 During the 1990s, a presented topic that conveyed feelings of negativity, mistrust, hostility, and change of subject was how racial bias may influence a health professional’s delivery of medical services.12 Racial inequalities have existed in several forms in which prejudice and discrimination have played continuing roles in society for many decades.

In 1999, Congress reauthorized the legislation from the Healthcare Research and Quality Care Act to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). This agency proposed to congress the first annual National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR) in December 2003. Information gathered in the report presents an overview of state of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in access and quality of care in America. The AHRQ created two different annual reports in which was the NHDR and the National Healthcare Quality Report (NHQR). The NHDR measures access of care and the barriers that are associated with them: entry, structural, cultural, healthcare use, and healthcare cost. The framework also measures the quality of care by the provider: effectiveness, safety, timeliness, and patient-centeredness.19 The consideration of congress undertaking a task recognizing healthcare disparities uncovers the importance of the connection between racial bias and access to quality healthcare.

Racial Disparities in Healthcare

Healthcare professionals from various disciplines have their own code of ethics to follow but share a commonality to commit to principles of equity, fairness, and distributive justice. Institutionalized racism, a discrepancy to consider, has a sufficient amount of evidence that has been revealed. It refers to a “set of organizational practices that create unequal outcomes between groups on the basis of their race or ethnicity”.12 Studies have shown that ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the field of medicine, especially as physicians.1 In the last decade, there have been policy changes and community efforts (either public or private) to address institutional racism in healthcare.12 There are two categories that construct racism holistically in deliverance of healthcare in the United States, which are institutionalized racism by the healthcare system and personally-mediated racism by the healthcare provider.13

The purpose of this SLR is to identify professional data that address racial biases and its correlation to receiving quality healthcare services by utilizing the Cochrane Review. Healthcare is a service that is provided to individuals to maintain a healthy lifestyle and prevent damaging effects to the body, Ethnic minorities may be disadvantaged to receive equal healthcare in comparison to their Caucasian counterparts. This SLR is intended to provide social workers with the necessary information to identify and alleviate health disparities in order to improve policy and change healthcare services delivered to ethnic minorities.

METHODS

A Cochrane systematic literature review (SLR) was utilized to identify existing professional literature on the influence of racial bias on healthcare disparities pertaining to the social work discipline and to identify any themes among those articles. The Cochrane method was used because it aims to identify the best evidence-based studies conducted in the healthcare field using the specific key words. The goal of a Cochrane SLR is to simplify the research process by searching multiple databases to negate selective bias.20 The researchers selected seven databases: Alt HealthWatch, EconLit, Education Research Complete, PsychARTICLES, PsychINFO, SocINDEX, and Social Work Abstracts. Additional limiters were selected to concisely create systematic literature review (SLR) as follows: (1) scholarly and peer-reviewed articles that have been written within the last 10 years (2007-2017), (2) used Racial Bias, Healthcare, Disparities, and Social Work as keywords. Researchers opted to use the five steps in the Cochrane Method to guide their SRL.

Step 1: Framing Questions for Review

The researchers selected the search engines (Social Work Abstracts, Alt Healthwatch, Econlit, Education Research Complete, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX with Full Text) for their relevance to the four keywords, Racial Bias, Healthcare, Disparities, and Social Work. Utilizing each step of the Cochrane review enabled appropriate articles to be found that would reveal relevant results and facilitate discussions pertaining to the correlation among healthcare services and racial bias.

Step 2: Identifying Relevant Work

Following the initial search, the authors strategically reduced the yield by limiting the research to scholarly peer review articles from the last 10 years (2007-2017). This process is documented in Tables 1 and 2. In most cases, articles published prior to 2006 were eliminated in effort to avoid time-dependent biases; however, two exceptions to this limitation were made based on the data analyzed. In one case, an article published by Gee and Walsemann,21 was eliminated because the findings were based on data from the early 1980s. In another case, a study originally published in 2003 but reprinted in 2008 was included due to the relevance of the findings (Table 3).22 The remaining articles underwent a thorough literature review process to assess for face validity, or an analysis of the relevance of the content to the proposed research question. To examine the presence of racial bias, or racism, articles relating to healthcare, available healthcare options, and pursuit of healthcare by racial minorities were included in this study (Table 3).

Step 3: Assessing the Quality of Studies

The authors reviewed the articles remaining after applying the limiters outlined in Table 1. These articles were selected from the initial data set. Following thorough literature review for face validity, or relevance to the research question, the authors had compiled a viable data set. Quality of the study was determined based on the stipulations of the Cochrane method. The data were limited to scholarly peer-reviewed articles published between 2007-2017, relating to racial bias and healthcare in regards to the social work field (Table 1).

Step 4: Summarizing the Evidence

As shown in Table 2, there is a deficit in the research on racial bias and healthcare. Following a test of face validity, articles (n=17) were identified as relevant to the study demonstrating a need for more research in this area. Relevant articles are summarized in Table 1 to provide an overview of key findings. Although the research is limited, common themes were illustrated throughout the literature.

Step 5: Interpreting the Findings

The authors documented these themes and related key points on literature review sheets. These were succinctly organized, which was used to derive the findings for this study. Articles came primarily from social science publications. The authors attempted to reduce bias towards social work by searching several databases including psychology, health, economy, and education. These articles were not limited to the United States or by language in attempts to provide a larger dataset.

Table 1:Synthesis of keywords for SLR.

Table 2: Literature review exclusion matrix for references.

Table 3:Synthesis of key articles in the SLR.

RESULTS

Framing Questions for Review

Upon completion of the SLR, 17 articles met the criteria to be included in this review: 16 peer reviewed articles and one editorial (Table 3). Findings may provide evidence that racial bias influences healthcare. Common themes found throughout suggest that racism negatively influences the health outcomes of minorities, as well as the type of healthcare options and services provided to them. One theme identified among the articles was the year of publication, as a bulk of the studies came from 2007 and 2014; five studies published in 2007 and four studies published in 2014. The remainder of the articles were dispersed evenly with the exception of 2010 and 2016 in which no published articles were found. Another theme found among the articles was the disciplines publishing the articles. Over half of the articles (n=9) were published in either a social science or medical journal. Three articles were published in social work journals. The residuum came from psychological, sociology or general publications.

Identifying Relevant Work

As shown in table 1 the initial search in the university’s collection of online databases yielded 30 articles. When the limiters were implemented, there were 24 remaining articles. After the research team conducted a face validity using literature reviews sheets, the research team eliminated seven articles that did not fit the parameters of the study (n=17) (Table 2).

Assessing the Quality of Studies

The 17 articles that fit the specific criteria were examined based on the type of study, which was the purpose for the study and the studies strengths and limitations. First, the type of study was examined to ensure that it was scientifically relevant. Second, the purpose of the study was analyzed to confirm that the articles content was relevant to the study. Lastly, the authors inspected the strengths and limitations of each article to safeguard against errors and biases.

Summarizing the Evidence

With a yield of 17 articles during the SLR, it is likely further research is required on racial disparities in healthcare. Only three articles were published in social work journals. The majority of the articles resulting from the SLR were published in the years 2007 and 2014, which supports a gap in current research that needs to be explored.

Interpreting the Findings

As evidenced in Table 3, a recurring theme throughout the articles under investigation was that Caucasian physicians tend to operate with an implicit/unconscious racial bias. Hall et al described implicit attitudes as “thoughts and feelings that often exist outside of conscious awareness and thus are difficult to consciously acknowledge and control”.3 This subtle bias may lead to the possibility that ethnic minorities receive poor quality healthcare and sometimes none atall. This unconscious bias may also occur among those who claim to have no explicit/conscious racial biases. Many articles seem to illustrate that this occurs because implicit bias plays on the deep-seated stereotypes one is exposed to throughout life.3,4,24,25 When physician’s minds are taxed and pressed for time it is harder for them to manage their unconscious thoughts towards ethnic minorities, and it impacts the care they provide. These articles appear to support that implicit bias impacts everything from physician-patient communication to final treatment plans.

DISCUSSION

Summary of Findings

After conducting the SLR using nine databases, four key words, and a face validity check, the research team identified 17 articles that fit the criteria established with the Cochrane Model. There were two major themes found among the articles including: (1) years of publication and (2) publishing discipline. The researchers attempted to reduce the risk of bias towards social work by searching multiple databases including many disciplines such as psychology, health, economy, and education. Further, they expanded the search outside of the United States in order to precisely grasp an understanding what was being published on this subject.

Interpretation of Findings

The articles included in this SLR illustrate that the medical field has a vested interest as disparities in healthcare cause a gap between the patients and themselves. However, it has also been shown that other disciplines such as social work, psychological, sociology believe this issue to be pertinent (Table 3). These articles also omit that more research is required to consider why more articles were published between 2007 and 2014, when compared to none in 2017. Was there an increase in minority’s access to healthcare, which increased the number of people experiencing these biases? Along with the recurrent theme of implicit bias on behalf of Caucasian physicians, the articles of this SLR attest that although society has come a long way from overt racist acts in healthcare such as denial of services and segregated medical facilities, there is still research to be done on racial disparities in healthcare.

LIMITATIONS

Methodological limitations may have occurred in our study by the inclusion of the keyword phrase “social work” (Table 1) as this may have limited the range of studies the authors had access to. With the inclusion of this keyword phrase the amount of perspectives to review on this issue were decreased significantly. However, this was an unexpected limitation as instructions indicated a social work perspective must be taken. Attempts were made to minimize this limitation by including other disciplines in the databases used to search for articles such as psychological, health, economic, and educational databases. With a wide range of databases searched, this SLR has been successful in overcoming the limitation related to the phrase “social work.”

Application to Social Work Policy and Practice

Concerns arise when contemplating if anything can be done to subdue an unconscious process like implicit bias. Fortunately, research has demonstrated that implicit bias can respond to changes made in situational cases and social norms. Other possibilities include strengthening patient’s defenses against bias or altering the system to mitigate potential bias. The physician-patient relationship is the most central aspect of healthcare, which intensifies the importance for addressing implicit racial bias among physicians.

The results of the current study discovered 17 articles, some of whichseem to indicate racial biases negatively influence health outcomes of minority ethnic groups, encouraging increasing health disparities. According to Cooper et al perhaps, healthcare providers may unconsciously reflect these biases during practice as implicit bias.7 This suggests the presence of unaddressed stereotypical beliefs within healthcare professionals, pointing to a potentially severe lack of awareness and deficit in cross-cultural understanding.

Lack of education and awareness is a recurrent theme within the professional literature available on this issue. In a study of a group of social work students, there was an overwhelming misunderstanding of what a health disparity is. Furthermore, it seems that Americans generally do not consider health disparities to be an actual phenomenon.23 This lack of belief directly reflects a lack of understanding of cross cultural experiences and is often reflected in negative and charged comments, suggesting that members of ethnic minority groups are unhealthy because they are lazy or choose to ignore their health. These types of beliefs ignore the fact that people’s environments impose difficulty in receiving healthcare, but also provide a reason for discriminatory judgment to be passed on them by healthcare providers, thus creating health disparities. This is congruent with the ideas presented by Krieger in a 2008 report, which states that discriminatory judgments impose limitations on the lives of minorities.22

Even in the current political climate where an African American became the president of the US there are political atmospheres that block the discussion on ethnic and racial disparities in healthcare. Studies have shown that people believe that with the election of an African American president there is no need to address the disparities any longer, some even say it “solved all our problems,” perhaps referring to racial divides.26 It is the justification of discriminatory behavior, examined in this study, that allows society to perpetuate disparities within healthcare.27 Discriminatory judgment may also persist due to ignorance about the experiences of other races or lack of interactions with other races.12 Promotion of cross-cultural education may enlighten healthcare providers to the experiences and perspectives of minorities. A study conducted by Hatcher, King et al explores the importance of the application of cross-cultural understanding to mental health interventions approaches within the African American community.28 It stated that to improve reception of mental healthcare, therapists should use interventions emphasizing themes that resonate with African American patients, such as liberation and unity. While this article only describes a cross-cultural understanding in relation to African Americans in mental healthcare, it can be expanded to include other racial minorities in general healthcare. When a healthcare provider does not have an understanding of the racial minority populations they work with, there could be a decreased receptiveness to treatment by the patient. By increasing cultural knowledge healthcare providers could increase receptiveness therein decreasing displayed implicit biases.

As social workers, it is imperative that we promote cross-cultural education within allied health programs to foster greater understanding of diverse racial groups and to encourage open and honest conversation and exploration of racial prejudices. Furthermore, we should encourage the implementation of early intervention during the education of future healthcare providers emphasizing the bi-relational impact of racial biases on healthcare to promote effective self-management of biases during practice.

For these reasons, it is important to continue research on the subject of racial disparities in healthcare. While research has revealed racial disparities in healthcare as a major issue that potentially impacts millions of patients, it has not yet demonstrated a clear reason for the disparities. Implicit bias appears to be the most widely discussed culprit for racial bias in healthcare, however it is difficult to definitively prove if a person’s bias truly arises from an unconscious cognition. Other proposed causes may be just as subjective. So perhaps, instead of putting heavy focus on determining the causes of this issue we should move forward educating medical professional and social workers on the biases that occur in the interactions between themselves and racial minority patients. By refocusing the goals of current research on racial disparities in healthcare, racial minority patients could one day be treated as equals, and never again have to worry if they will get the medical treatments necessary to keep them healthy and alive.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Gartland JJ, Nasca TJ, Christian EB. A role for this country’s medical schools in improving provided minority health care. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2008; 20(1) :82-83. doi: 10.1080/10401330701798402

2. Blair IV, Havranek EP, Price DW, et al. Assessment of biases against latinos and african americans among primary care providers and community members. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(1): 92-98. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2012.300812

3. Hall WJ, Chapman MV, Lee KM, et al. Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health. 2015; 105(12): 2588-2588. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903

4. Ryn MV, Saha S. Exploring unconscious bias in disparities research and medical education. JAMA. 2011; 306(9): 995-996. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1275

5. Stone J, Moskowitz GB. Non-conscious bias in medical decision making: What can be done to reduce it? Med Educ. 2011; 45(8): 768-776. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04026.x

6. White-Means S, Dong Z, Hufstader M, Brown LT. Cultural competency, race, and skin tone bias among pharmacy, nursing, and medical students. Med Care Res Rev. 2009; 66(4): 436-455. doi: 10.1177/1077558709333995

7. Cooper LA, Roter DL, Carson KA, et al. The associations of clinicians’ implicit attitudes about race with medical visit communication and patient ratings of interpersonal care. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(5): 979-987. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2011.300558

8. Dovidio JF, Penner LA, Albrecht TL, Norton WE, Gaertner SL, Shelton JN. Disparities and distrust: The implications of psychological processes for understanding racial disparities in health and health care. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(3): 478-486. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.019

9. Acevedo-Garcia D, Rosenfeld LE, Hardy E, Mcardle N, Osypuk TL. Future directions in research on institutional and interpersonal discrimination and children’s health. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(10): 1754-1763. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2012.300986

10. Braveman P. Health inequalities by class and race in the US: What can we learn from the patterns? Soc Sci Med. 2012; 74(5): 665-667. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.009

11. Tait RC, Chibnall JT. Racial/ethnic disparities in the assessment and treatment of pain: Psychosocial perspectives. Am Psychol. 2014; 69(2): 131-141. doi: 10.1037/a0035204

12. Ryn MV, Burgess DJ, Dovidio JF, et al. The impact of racism on clinician cognition, behavior, and clinical decision making. Du Bois Rev. 2011; 8(01): 199-218. doi: 10.1017/s1742058x11000191

13. Peek ME, Odoms-Young A, Quinn MT, Gorawara-Bhat R, Wilson SC, Chin MH. Racism in healthcare: Its relationship to shared decision-making and health disparities: A response to Bradby. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71(1): 13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.018

14. Sabin JA, Rivara FP, Greenwald AG. Physician implicit attitudes and stereotypes about race and quality of medical care. Med Care. 2008; 46(7): 678-685. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181653d58

15. Kaiser Family Foundation. Web site. http://www.kff.org/. Accessed February 19, 2017.

16. Roy S. Cambridge English Dictionary. New Delhi, India: Pankaj; 1986.

17. Racism. Dictionary.com Unabridged. Web site. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/racism. . Accessed February 12, 2017.

18. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Choice Reviews Online. 2003; 40(10): 40-5843-40-5843.

19. Siegel S, Moy E, Burstin H. Assessing the nation’s progress toward elimination of disparities in health care. J Gen Intern Med, 2004; 19(2): 195-200.

20. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2014. 

21. Gee G, Walsemann K. Does health predict the reporting of racial discrimination or do reports of discrimination predict health? Findings from the national longitudinal study of youth. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68(9): 1676-1684. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.002

22. Krieger N. Does racism harm health? Did child abuse exist before 1962? on explicit questions, critical science, and current controversies: An ecosocial perspective. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: S20-S25.

23. Browne T, Pitner R, Freedman DA. When identifying health disparities as a problem is a problem: Pedagogical strategies for examining racialized contexts. J Prev Interv Community. 2013; 41(4): 220-230. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2013.818481

24. Kolivoski K, Weaver A, Constance-Huggins M. Critical race theory: Opportunities for application in social work practice and policy. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services. 2014; 95(4): 269-276. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.2014.95.36

25. Levine CS, Ambady N. The role of non-verbal behaviour in racial disparities in health care: Implications and solutions. Med Educ. 2013; 47(9): 867-876. doi: 10.1111/medu.12216

26. Devi S. Getting to the root of Americas racial health inequalities. Lancet. 2012; 380(9847): 1043-1044. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61584-0

27. Shavers V, Klein W, Fagan P. Research on race/ethnicity and health care discrimination: Where we are and where we need to go. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(5): 930-932. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300708

28. Hatcher SS, King DM, Barnett TM, Burley JT. Mental health for youth: Applying an African-centered approach. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 2016; 27(1-2): 61-72. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2016.1259930

29. Bhattacharya G. Contextualizing disparity reduction in rural healthcare: A call to action. Journal of Family Social Work. 2013; 16(1): 86-100. doi: 10.1080/10522158.2012.736079

30. Dettlaff AJ, Rivaux SL, Baumann DJ, Fluke JD, Rycraft JR, James J. Disentangling substantiation: The influence of race, income, and risk on the substantiation decision in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review. 2011; 33(9): 1630-1637. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.005

31. Gee G, Walsemann K. Does health predict the reporting of racial discrimination or do reports of discrimination predict health? Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth? Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68(9): 1676-1684. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.002

32. Kegler MC, Hall SM, Kiser M. Facilitators, challenges, and collaborative activities in faith and health partnerships to address health disparities. Health Educ Behav. 2010; 37(5): 665-679. doi: 10.1177/1090198110363882

33. McAllister CL, Thomas TL, Wilson PC, Green BL. Root shocked revisited: Perspectives of early head start mothers on community and policy environments and their effects on child health, development, and school readiness. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(2): 205-210.

34. Noël LT, Whaley AL. Ethnic/racial differences in depression among U.S. primary care patients: Cultural considerations in screening and detection. Journal of Ethnic And Cultural Diversity in Social Work. 2012; 21(4): 314-330. doi: 10.1080/15313204.2012.729180

35. Wolff T. Community psychology practice: Expanding the impact of psychology’s work. American Psychologist. 2014; 69(8): 803-813. doi: 10.1037/a0037426

Volume 1, Issue 1
September 2017
Pages 7-18

All for Joomla All for Webmasters